All study-specific advertisements must be approved by a EC. The Clinical Trials Directive guidance document on EC applications give advice about advertising for subjects for clinical trials. Advertisements should say that the trial involves research and that the advertisement has been approved by a EC, and should give a contact name and phone number and some of the selection criteria. In addition, advertisements may give the purpose of the clinical trial, where it will take place and the name of the company or institution carrying it out.
However, advertisements must never over-stress payment, use EC or BDA approval as an inducement, name and promote the product, or claim that it is safe. To ensure consistency, in the advertising for Phase I studies should seek ethical advice on the procedures. Whatever the method of recruitment, subjects must be recruited of their own free will. They should not be made to feel obliged to take part in a clinical trial, nor should they suffer in any way if they do not take part.
At Convex we keep records of subjects who take part in their trials and avoid excessive use of any subject. The number of trials that a subject may take part in during any 12-month period will depend on:
Trial subjects must provide proof of identity before they take part in a trial and should be monitored and prevented from taking part in too many trials. The ways to ensure this are:
The inclusion of women as early as possible in drug development might be a valuable clinical strategy depending on the characteristics of the IMP and on its primary indication.
In the exploratory Phase I trials such as single and multiple ascending doses, women will typically be of non-child-bearing potential being subject to the standard inclusion/exclusion criteria for the trial to be conducted.
However, when a sponsor has decided to include Women Of Child Bearing Potential (WOCBP), particular considerations should be given depending on the speculated magnitude of human teratogenicity/fetotoxicity.
The written informed consent form and any other written information to be provided to subjects for an FIH trial present unique challenges to the author. The document must provide an interpretation of risk derived solely from pre-clinical data and knowledge of the pharmacological target in a way that is easily understood by a lay person. In the choice of site, the sponsor should check that the site has robust consent procedures in place, and should consider the PI’s experience in writing or reviewing informed consent documents.
Some specifics of the informed consent documentation for FIH clinical trials are different from those of later trials or later phase trials. For example, in most cases with FIH clinical trials, the written informed consent form is drafted by the unit staff rather than the sponsor, and it must contain the rationale in lay language for the start dose and the maximum dose.
The critically important information on the drug characteristics (pharmacological and toxicological) to support the start dose and the maximum dose should be provided by the sponsor who also bears a responsibility for the wording being chosen to be easily understood by a lay person. Otherwise, the elements of the informed consent discussion and the written informed consent form must comply with the Good Clinical Practice
Before subjects decide to have the tests for viruses and for drugs of abuse, the investigator must explain to them what will happen if one of the tests turns out to be positive.
Healthy subjects often have minor out-of-range results of safety tests of blood and urine, and minor variants of the ECG. Some CRAs/ medical monitors and auditors regard these as deviations from the protocol of a trial in healthy subjects. However, usually they have no clinical relevance and do not justify excluding subjects from a trial. A physician should decide their clinical relevance, and the protocol should allow for use of clinical judgment.
The investigator should ask potential trial subjects for permission to contact their General Practitioner (GP). Subjects who do not have a GP or do not want their GP to be contacted should be excluded from the trial unless there is a good reason to the contrary.
The investigator should ask the GP to reply in writing. The investigator must be able to justify including in the trial a subject whose GP does not give any information. Whether or not the GP responds, the investigator is ultimately responsible for making sure that subjects are suitable for the trial before allowing them to take part in it.
The investigator must assess the health of trial subjects throughout the trial and should withdraw any subject whose health is at risk. The methods should include:
The clinical trial protocol should include information on follow-up requirements. For example, the investigator will follow up:
Data base of healthy subjects | Every year hundreds of healthy volunteers participate in our research programmes. Based on the length of the clinical study or subjects involvement the studies are paid differently. |
Healthy subject | Any non-smoking person, over 18 years of age, who has no chronic or accute disease can freely register for further clinical assessments and participation into our clinical trial pipeline. |
Clinical trial duration | A Clinical trial can vary between single ambulatory visit tomultiple site visits or from 24 hour site stay to 30 days of hospitalization. A study might have a long period of follow-up after the clinical trial treatment phase is completed. |
Paid clinical studies | All clinical trials which enroll healthy subjects are paid. Reimbursement fee depends on many details over a study design, time participation and variety of clinical reserch procedures involved. |
Clinical research center with phase I unit | Our research institution is build-up in a way to confort our research participants so that everyone can enjoy their time during the entire course of a clinical research study. |